Google’s latest test, the AI Max ad group setting, is raising eyebrows across the paid search world. In a move that feels like the next phase of full automation, AI Max eliminates match types entirely and hands Google the reins on creative, targeting, and keyword expansion. It's part of a bigger trend: giving AI more control and marketers less.
So… what does that mean for your campaigns? And should you be testing it?
In this post, I’ll break down when AI Max might make sense, how to test it smartly (without blowing up your pipeline), and what I anticipate is coming next for advertiser control on Google.
AI Max isn't for everyone, but under the right conditions, it can offer incremental performance gains.
We’d consider testing the AI Max setting under specific conditions, such as when we have strong conversion tracking in place and sufficient budget for testing and are already seeing diminishing returns from traditional search setups.
If you’re optimizing for volume over precision (e.g. awareness or impressions), AI Max might also be worth exploring. But don’t flip the switch blindly. There are some serious trade-offs in control, and without the right guardrails, it’s easy to overspend on low-quality traffic.
Testing doesn’t mean surrendering all control to the algorithm. I recommend several key safeguards to keep your campaigns on track while testing AI Max:
If AI Max feels like a big shift, you’re not wrong. Google has been laying this groundwork for years, but even in that context it’s a major step toward automation.
As for what’s coming next, Manual CPC is likely on the chopping block. Google has already removed eCPC and is pushing advertisers into Smart Bidding-only territory.
Other possibilities:
What we’re seeing now is likely a preview of a keyword-less future, where Google’s AI predicts intent, builds creative, and chooses audiences, and marketers focus more on creative inputs, conversion tracking, and strategic oversight than granular control.
Yes: if you have strong measurement in place, budget flexibility, and a high-volume or exploratory goal. But don’t try anything without proper guardrails.
No: if you're still dialing in core performance or rely heavily on precise targeting and quality control.
If you want to chat about guardrails, testing structures, and other kinds of campaign control we can still flex, drop us a line.